Arctic Youth Oceans (AYO)
Empowering Today’s Youth to Impact the Future
Ocean biodiversity is a question that affects all our lives and our collective future. Young people should have a say in building that future, and thus, in how the world tackles the issue of managing and preserving ocean biodiversity.
Although often referred to as separate oceans, the world’s ocean, one interconnected body of saltwater, covers about 71% of the Earth’s surface and is home to an important, unique part of the planet’s biodiversity.
Marine organisms provide half of the oxygen we need, absorb carbon dioxide from the planet’s atmosphere, and they perform a variety of other essential roles. The world ocean also provides main protein sources for millions of people, it ensures many people’s livelihoods, and it shapes many cultures. These processes depend on the ocean maintaining high levels of biodiversity – which is where the Arctic Youth Network (AYN) Oceans Group steps in.
What Is the Oceans Group?
The AYN Oceans Group is a youth-led platform for young people across the world to discuss and collaborate on ocean governance, conservation, and sustainable use. Members from all over the globe discuss and collaborate on ocean-relevant topics of their own choosing.
This year, the spotlight is on the Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction agreement – also known as the BBNJ.
What is the BBNJ?
The United Nations (UN) are currently in the final stages of drafting an international, legally binding agreement about the world ocean with the goal of “long-term conservation and sustainable use of marine resources in areas beyond national jurisdiction”
The process, up until now, has been lacking youth involvement and voices.
What Are Our Goals?
- To break down and clarify/decipher/explain the BBNJ process in order to raise awareness among young people.
- To provide educational materials on the subject, participate in conferences, and elevate youth engagement on the matter.
- To simplify the advocacy of the oceans’ protection for youth.
- To protect biodiversity in the high seas.
To learn more about the AYO and participate in further efforts like this BBNJ project, join the Arctic Youth Network here.
Some responsibility of caring for ocean life is assigned to nations with coastlines whose borders extend into the sea. However, the governance of the ocean and its biodiversity is highly complex and influenced by multiple organizations, regional, national and international.
The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) can be considered the primary international legal norm for global ocean governance. It sets out a legal order for the seas and oceans, and promotes the peaceful use and the equitable, efficient utilization of its resources, as well as the protection of the marine environment.
UNCLOS defines sovereign states’ rights and responsibilities with respect to their use of the world’s oceans, and defines which areas are within and beyond national jurisdiction.
National jurisdictions include the territorial seas, the exclusive economic zone (EEZ), and/or the continental shelf of the coastal nations – here is an infographic with more details. (Coastal states exercise sovereign rights over the EEZ and the continental shelf to exploit and explore natural resources.)
More than half of the entire ocean (64%) is international waters, which belongs to no one and everyone at the same time. These are called areas beyond national jurisdiction (ABNJ). (ABNJ which lie beyond the EEZ of coastal states comprises the high seas, referring to the water columns and the free-swimming species they contain, and the Area, referring to the seabed, ocean floor and subsoil (minerals, oil, etc.) beyond the limits of the continental shelf.)
Therefore, anyone may access the resources living in the high seas, but no one is responsible for protecting them or making sure the resources are used sustainably. These types of resources are often referred to as the “global commons”.
On an equally crucial note, marine species’ habitats exist regardless of human-made boundaries such as EEZs and ABNJ, and many species move freely across the globe using both territorial, coastal waters, and the high seas.
Therefore, ocean management must approach the world’s ocean as a single ecosystem. It is critical to elaborate an effective, unified legal framework to protect biodiversity in ABNJ.
Having so many regulations, agreements, and conventions relating to biodiversity conservation in ABNJ only makes the matter more complex, fragmented, and difficult to manage and monitor. This fragmented set of regulations does not provide international, comprehensive or adequate protection for biodiversity beyond national jurisdiction. In joining AYO’s efforts, you can contribute to rectifying this situation.
The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea – UNCLOS
In addition to setting the foundation for the rights and responsibilities of sovereign states regarding the world’s oceans, UNCLOS provides the freedom of the high seas, thereby allowing open access to the high seas for all states.
This includes the right to conduct scientific research for peaceful purposes. At the same time, the states are obliged to protect the environment and conserve living resources through national, regional and international cooperation.
However, the boundaries and limitations of this obligation have never been defined and no management criteria have been set.
In the ABNJ, the deep seabed and its resources, unlike the high seas, are regulated as the “common heritage of mankind” under UNCLOS. It is explicitly stated that the “exploration and exploitation [of the common heritage of mankind] shall be carried out for the benefit of mankind as a whole”.
States have a general obligation to protect and preserve the marine environment under Part XII of UNCLOS according to which they are not merely expected to show restraint regarding environmental harm, but they also have to take positive steps to protect the environment.
However, not every state has signed UNCLOS, such as the US for example. For non-party states, UNCLOS represents customary international law, which means that they are legally not bound by the regulations set out under UNCLOS.
The 1992 Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD)
The 1992 Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) sets a legal framework for the conservation of biodiversity and the sustainable use of its components. These Conventions are the main framework treaties with legally binding power for biodiversity conservation. However, the CBD, for example, provides a wider framework for the protection of all aspects of biodiversity.
The Convention also includes provisions on the high seas but does not specifically focus on their management.
Additional Environmental Agreements
Further key environmental arrangements are the UN Fish Stocks Agreement and the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (MARPOL). These environmental agreements also recognise the need for the protection of biodiversity, but often leave the ABNJ largely unregulated.
The OSPAR Convention (1992) under which the world’s first network of MPAs in ABNJ was established is a good example for regional regulation (Rochette et al. 2014).
The Antarctic Treaty System (1959) serves as an additional regional agreement focused on the protection of marine biodiversity.
The AYO is helping to define a unified legal framework that will help resolve all these matters – your voice in this process can be a great asset to the cause.
The rapidly evolving ocean technologies have led to unprecedented pressures on the ocean, further amplified by increasingly prevalent anthropocentric changes to the Earth systems (e.g., climate change, loss of biodiversity, toxic waste, pollution of air, water and soils).
The loss of biodiversity on the planet has only become more severe and obvious in recent decades (IPBES, 2019). This loss is also occurring in the world ocean (Murawski, 2007; Palumbi, 2009; Worm, 2006; Halpern et al., 2019; IPCC, 2019; Merrie et al., 2014; United Nations, 2015; Watson and Tidd, 2018) and includes the loss of species not yet known to science in the deep sea (Danovaro, 2008). Oceanic biodiversity loss renders ecosystems less resilient to impacts of climate change, disease, invasive species, and overexploitation (UNEP, 2006). Human activities in the high seas can significantly impact ocean biodiversity, and must therefore be managed through an overarching legal framework to provide a realistic opportunity for the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity in ABNJ.
In 2015, after review of existing protections for ocean life in international waters, a UN working group concluded that existing protections were not sufficient to protect biodiversity. Currently, there are no legally binding mechanisms for establishing marine protected areas in the high seas, or for undertaking environmental impact assessments in order to conserve and sustainably use any high seas resources. In 2017 the UN General Assembly (resolution 72/249) officially decided to create an international agreement to achieve the goals of “long-term conservation and sustainable use of marine resources in areas beyond national jurisdiction” (“BBNJ”).
The lack of a comprehensive legal framework protecting marine biodiversity in ABNJ in addition to the challenges of the 21st century, such as increased human activities and climate change highlights/illustrates the need for improved marine management. As such, the Open-Ended Informal Consultative Process on Oceans and the Law of the Sea (UNICPOLOS) has initiated the process by underlining the urgency of developing norms and mechanisms that aim towards the protection of vulnerable ecosystems, including areas beyond national jurisdiction.
The BBNJ instrument is widely seen as a historic opportunity to fill regulatory and governance gaps with respect to the conservation and sustainable use of marine biodiversity in ABNJ by creating a just and sustainable framework for the environment and humankind.
The need for better governance of human activities in the ocean space to guarantee the sustainability of contributions of the ocean to people has been widely recognized for years.
In light of that need, the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) appointed an ad hoc, open-ended, informal working group (BBNJ WG). After conducting extensive research, the BBNJ WG recommended in its 2011 report that the UNGA initiates a process to tackle this issue. Among others, the report suggested the development of a multilateral agreement on marine biodiversity in areas beyond national jurisdiction under UNCLOS.
The report also identified four substantive areas to be addressed throughout the process, which are:
- Area-based Management Tools (ABMTs), including Marine Protected Areas (MPAs),
- Marine Genetic Resources (MGRs), including benefit-sharing issues,
- Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs),
- Capacity building and transfer of marine technology (CBTT).
The final BBNJ WG report was submitted in 2015. On its basis, the UNGA convened a process to develop an international legally binding instrument (ILBI) under the UNCLOS on the conservation and sustainable use of BBNJ.
The negotiations on the draft text of the future international agreement under the auspices of the UN are held in four scheduled Intergovernmental Conferences (IGCs). Three of these conferences have been held from fall 2018 to fall 2019.
The final IGC has been postponed from spring 2020 due to the worldwide COVID-19 pandemic but is now scheduled for fall 2021.
Therefore, the General Assembly decided to continue the dialogue on the four elements through intersessional work in the time period from September 2020 to March 2021. These sessions were enabled by the facilitators of the informal working groups that were established by the Conference on the different negotiated issues. This intercessional work, however, was not set up to replace the negotiations but rather to keep the momentum going and allow the clarification of positions as well as to enhance mutual understanding.
Although many UN members and independent non-governmental organizations (NGOs) have been involved in the process of forming an international BBNJ agreement, the process lacks meaningful youth involvement.
Why? Because the BBNJ process is large in scope, intricate, and difficult to navigate. To Help address the issue, the Arctic Youth Network Oceans Working Group (AYO) was launched in 2020 with a temporary focus on this specific and significant task: to study the BBNJ process and make it more accessible and engaging for young adults.
Feel free to join the cause and become an AYO member today
Meet The Team
These young, dedicated professionals from various fields are contributing to the goals of this organization in a number of invaluable ways. The team is constantly growing, and our voice is getting stronger every day. If you wish to commit your own time and knowledge to these goals, feel free to get in touch with us and join our team.
Co-Founder
Pétur Halldórsson is a biologist with a postgraduate diploma in public administration from the University of Iceland. He took part in founding the Arctic Youth Network and led the early development stages of the AYN Oceans Working Group. Pétur is currently a board member of the Icelandic Environment Association (Landvernd) and is passionate about ecosystem restoration and cross-cultural cooperation.
Inga Banschikova
Co-Founder
Inga Banschikova is a Fulbright Scholar from Russia. Holds bachelor’s degree in International Relations, master’s degree in International law. Currently finishing her master’s program at Oregon State University at School of Public Policy. Research interest: international environmental law and policy in the Arctic region. Two-time winner of the Russian Geographical Society’s grant. Currently works as a research assistant in WWF Arctic Team.
Mana Tugend
Co-Founder
Mana Tugend is a PhD fellow in law at the Norwegian Centre for the Law of the Sea (NCLOS) in Tromsø, Norway. Her areas of interest include international environmental law, law of the sea, gender issues and human rights.
Filip Alimpic
Team Lead
Filip is a teaching associate at Singidunum University, Belgrade, Serbia, working within the department for the environment and sustainable development studies. With a Master’s Degree in environmental studies, Filip is researching volatile organic compounds and their correlation and impact on the environment and biosphere.
When he’s not engaging students in the classroom, patiently focused in the lab, or ardently presenting his research in a lecture hall, Filip spends his time reading and listening to really good music.
Rachel Sullivan-Lord
ReCon Team Lead
Rachel is a marine ecologist and graduate student in the Centre for Wildlife Ecology at Simon Fraser University in Vancouver, Canada. Her research involves strategic interactions between marine mammal predators and prey and the wider ecological impacts of these interactions in the context of rapidly changing oceans.
Improving science communication and international collaborations outside of traditional scientific circles in relation to conservation is a top priority for Rachel, and the AYO is an excellent platform to create and support these efforts.
Katharina Heinrich
ReCon Team Lead
Katharina is a researcher in Polar Law (M.A) and a current Master of Resource Management candidate in Coastal and Marine Management at the University Center of the Westfjords in Iceland. Her research focuses on issues pertaining to the Polar Regions with a focus on Law of the Sea, Marine Biodiversity Management, and the inclusion of Indigenous Peoples Rights in marine management processes.
In her free time, Kat enjoys hiking, skiing, and exploring every corner of Iceland.
Laura Jarycki
Designer
Laura Jarycki is currently getting her Bachelor of Science at Western University. Her passion for the polar region and marine biodiversity started when she went on an Arctic expedition with Students on Ice in 2019.
Outside of school she loves camping, hiking, and reading.
She is currently working with Mission Isla, a new organization she founded, focused on making environmental education accessible to everyone and safeguarding island nations in Asia Pacific.
Thus, Manon challenged herself to pursue an LLM programme in international law at the University of Montreal (Canada) in order to specialize in conservation issues related to marine species.
He is the project coordinator with C3HD on the education project, but also the project team lead with the Yobe Youths Coalition for Environmental Challenges, the project officer with the Malaria Accountability and Advocacy project. He is presently working on 3 projects: 1. Education in Crises, funded by Canada. 2. Malaria Accountability and Advocacy, funded by Global Fund. and 3. Youth for Our Planet, country mobilizer Nigeria.
As a highly motivated entrepreneur with multiple start-ups, Can is always looking to build strong connections. Coming from a diverse background and having experience in marketing and sales representative positions, Can is able to expand network connections with his excellent communication and interpersonal skills which allow him to cultivate partnerships and grow profit channels.
Can loves hiking in spectacular land and seascapes in NS. He loves producing and listening to music, going to the gym, and actively enjoying sports with his friends. He loves travelling the world, meeting new people and cultures. For Can, being part of the AYN community is an incredible chance to connect cultures and create opportunities for youth everywhere.
Danovaro, R., Gambi, C., Dell’Anno, A., Corinaldesi, C., Fraschetti, S., Vanreusel, A., … Gooday, A. J. (2008). Exponential Decline of Deep-Sea Ecosystem Functioning Linked to Benthic Biodiversity Loss. Current Biology, 18(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2007.11.05
De Lucia, V. (2019). The BBNJ negotiations and ecosystem governance in the arctic. Marine Policy, 103756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2019.103756
Gruber, N. et al. (2019). The oceanic sink for anthropogenic CO2 from 1994 to 2007. Science 363, 1193–1199.
Haas, B., Mackay, M., Novaglio, C. et al. (2021). The future of ocean governance. Rev Fish Biol Fisheries . https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-020-09631-x.
Halpern, B.S., Frazier, M., Afflerbach, J., Lowndes, J.S., Micheli, F., O’Hara, C., Scarborough, C., Selkoe, K.A., (2019). Recent pace of change in human impact on the world’s ocean. Sci. Rep. 9, 11609. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47201-9.
IPCC, (2019). Summary for policymakers. In: IPCC Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate ([online] [accessed).
Merrie, A., Dunn, D.C., Metian, M., Boustany, A.M., Takei, Y., Elferink, A.O., Ota, Y., Christensen, V., Halpin, P.N., Ӧsterblom, H. (2014). An ocean of surprises – trends in human use, unexpected dynamics and governance challenges in areas beyond national jurisdiction. Glob. Environ. Chang. 27, 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. gloenvcha.2014.04.012.
Murawski, S., Methot, R., Tromble, G., Hilborn, R. W., Briggs, J. C., Worm, B., … & Watson, R. (2007). Biodiversity loss in the ocean: how bad is it?. Science.
Palumbi, S. R., Sandifer, P. A., Allan, J. D., Beck, M. W., Fautin, D. G., Fogarty, M. J., … & Wall, D. H. (2009). Managing for ocean biodiversity to sustain marine ecosystem services. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7(4), 204-211.
Rudolph, Brodie T., Ruckelshaus, M., Swilling, M., Allison, E.H., Österblom, H., Gelcich, S. and Mbatha, P. (2020). A transition to sustainable ocean governance. Nature Communications, 11, 3600; Koivurova, Kirchner and Kleemola-Juntunen (n 16)
Sala, E., Mayorga, J., Bradley, D. et al. (2021). Protecting the global ocean for biodiversity, food and climate. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03371-z
Rochette, J., Unger, S., Herr, D., Johnson, D., Nakamura, T., Packeiser, T., … & Cebrian, D. (2014). The regional approach to the conservation and sustainable use of marine biodiversity in areas beyond national jurisdiction. Marine Policy, 49, 109-117.
Stewart M. Patrick, Why the U.N. Pact on High Seas Biodiversity Is Too Important to Fail, World Politics Review, July 8, 2019, https://www.worldpoliticsreview.com/articles/28011/why-the-u-n-pact-on-high-seas-biodiversity-is-too-important-to-fail
United Nations. (2017) Technical Abstract of the First Global Integrated Marine Assessment on the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Marine Biological Diversity of Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction. https://www.un.org/depts/los/global_reporting/8th_adhoc_2017/Technical_Abstract_on_the_Conservation_and_Sustainable_Use_of_marine_ Biological_Diversity_of_Areas_Beyond_National_Jurisdiction.pdf
United Nations (2015). Summary of the First Global Integrated Marine Assessment (Submitted by the Co-Chairs of the Ad Hoc Working Group of the Whole) (A/70/ 112). [online]. www.un.org/regularprocess/content/first-world-ocean-assessment.
UNEP (2006). Ecosystems and Biodiversity in Deep Waters and High Seas.UNEP Regional Seas Reports and Studies No. 178. UNEP/ IUCN, Switzerland 2006. https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/11811/rsrs178.pdf
Vidas, D. (2011). The Anthropocene and the International Law of the Sea. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 369, 909.
Watson, R.A., Tidd, A. (2018). Mapping nearly a century and a half of global marine fishing: 1869–2015. Mar. Policy 93, 171–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. marpol.2018.04.023.
Winther, J.G., Dai, M., Rist, T. et al. (2020). Integrated ocean management for a sustainable ocean economy. Nature, Ecology and Evolution, 4, 1451–1458.
Worm, Boris, et al. (2006). “Impacts of biodiversity loss on ocean ecosystem services.” science 314.5800: 787-790.